The Instagram for doctors just raised a fresh $10 million
Figure 1 isnt for the squeamish, but investors apparently love it. The corporation, a kind of social network where more than thousands and thousands of healthcare professionals can view rare conditions, informed about novel treatments and even teach cases, has just raised $10 million in Series B funding.
Kensington Capital Partners contributed the round in Figure 1, which has also been called the Instagram for physicians. Other participants include Samsung NEXT, insurance conglomerate John Hancock/ Manulife, the venture debt firm WTI, the Canadian investment firm Hedgewood, and earlier benefactors Union Square Ventures, Rho Canada Ventures, and Version One Ventures.
Last week, we caught up with Figure 1 founder and CEO Gregory Levey to read the latest about the operations( ahem) of his four-year-old, 50 -person, Toronto-based startup, which has now created more than $20 million altogether. Our converse has been edited for length.
TC: People are under the impression that only medical professionals can sign up to Figure 1, but thats not so . strong>
GL: Anyone can join. In reality, we kid that its all columnists and VCs people who are curious. But only medical professionals can post photos and induce statements. Otherwise, youget a modified experience where you can see stuff but you cant post or comment. If we substantiate you as a healthcare professional, you get access to different stuff, as well.
TC: When you say healthcare professional, thats doctors and nurses. What about students ? strong>
GL: We dont want pre-med, but we make an exception for nurse students, and about 70 percent of med students around the country are members.
TC: So your members are mostly in the U.S .? strong>
GL: About two-thirds are the in U.S. The second most involved user base we have is in Latin America. We inadvertently[ hired a lot of Brazilians] and have a whole Portuguese-speaking side of the office[ laughs ], this is why we build the app in both Spanish and Portuguese. We also have a lot of members in the U.K ., and Australia is big. People also like us in emerging marketplaces, but you get into bandwidth issues; the phones arent really at the different levels which allows you retain[ the Figure 1 app] on your phone because of storage issues.
TC: How many registered and active users do you have ? strong>
GL: Were tracking toward a big user milestone now, but weve disclosed in the past that we have more than two million registered consumers and have hundreds of thousands of monthly active customers. There are 800,000 physicians in the U.S.
TC: In words of participation, what do you insure? Is it like other social networks, where a small subset of visitors is active and everyone else is sort of playing the part of voyeur ? strong>
GL: Id say its pretty standard, though theres maybe more discussion on Figure 1 than in other places. We also recently opened up text-based suits, so instead of simply posting a depict, a doctor who didnt get granted permission to take a portrait can describe what he or she saw; we also have mental health professionals describing instances. Thats grown quite dramatically.
Theres a lot of social learning on the platform. I used to think everyone had to post instances, but were realizing the analogy is more a YouTube versus Twitter. Ive never posted a video on YouTube, but I watch it all the time. People get real value out of it, but not everyone wants to post a medical lawsuit and thats fine.
TC: How do you ensure you have content across a number of verticals, or does it merely happen organically ? strong>
GL: In the beginning, we have spoken picking one vertical within healthcare; instead, we cast a super-wide net, opening it up to everyone from those working in lab medicine to psychologists, and it developed organically from there. We dont truly consciously go after certain groups.
TC: You lately began experimenting with monetization, adding sponsored content to the platform, including having brands sponsor doctors to teach other doctors on the platform. Hows that moving ? strong>
GL. Its going well. Its still early. Weve had a tremendous reception from patrons more than we can manage, really, which is good. So far, consumers are responding well to it, too, because were focused on high quality. In reality, can often reading higher engagement than with our non-sponsored content, which is user generated.
TC: Are you thinking to feature more professional content?
GL: We dont want to become a media company. Were careful not to do that. The heart and soul of Figure 1 is the users themselves.
TC: How will you use your new funding ? strong>
GL: We want to use it to grow our user reach. The revenue material is working, so a big employ of the funds will likewise be pushing[ further] into that. Were also exploring new technologies and new revenue streams. We were new and arousing four years earlier; we want to be new and exciting today, too. Theres a lot of value in the cases, for example, were thinking how to leverage that have hired a senior machine learning guy. Sponsored content is great and potentially massive from a revenue standpoint. I had no expressed appreciation for the level of marketing invest[ that companies are authorizing ]. Were talking, too, with institutions that are interested in premium features for employees.
TC: Would you ever expand into another industry ? strong>
GL: Its funny. A friend was like, You need to do this for mare racing! I was like, I dont think so! But dentistry may have its own necessities, so were considering something in that realm. Another thing I think about, perhaps because Im a puppy devotee, is veterinary. We have a lot of veterinarians on Figure 1 and they cant post, but theyll construct comments about[ a human case ], like, This is a similar presentation that happens in a feline, and people will shoo them away. Theyre like, Get out of here.